Wednesday, December 16, 2015

My Friend Troy

     Functioning Discipleship     
          In this report we will unfold the details of a functioning discipleship relationship. There are four major areas in this relationship that we will use to define the term, discipleship relationship also called a discipling relationship; trust, teaching, friendship in partnership and impressing the legacy of love. Jesus tells us that He is the Way and that the only way to the Father is through Him but Jesus did not leave us with a mold or methodology as to how to get there. In fact, we see Jesus use a number of ways to extend the invitation of the good news and each of them welcome the individual to pick up their own mat and walk. When training one another in Christ we must allow each other the freedom to come to Jesus on our own two feet.
            The example relationship we will examine is between this writer and my friend Troy. Our relationship began under strange circumstances but over time developed into a mutually beneficial partnership. Troy was our campus ministry leader in Albuquerque and we were introduced by title before names were given, as I served as a campus minister for a number of years before. When followers of Christ become professional Christians we follow suit and treat each other accordingly. This is still a very cordial and friendly, if not politically correct, approach but it is not family.
            Building trust takes quality time and no title given to an individual can replace the value of time spent together. When asking Troy whether or not it was easy to understand my perspective on the Bible and the Christian life or whether it took time to understand, Troy responded that the understanding was there immediately as there was nothing new being said but the life takes time to accept. This is wise because so many are willing to try anything for what they perceive to be success but an examination of the individual’s life may not back up their teaching. This is truly the heart of a Berean and one that is sought after by our Father in Heaven as my titles or achievements meant very little but life and doctrine would continue to be the dividing line.
            This was the beginning of trust for Troy and I. Trust is of course either strengthened or weakened by the fruit we produce. Fortunately for the follower of Christ we have no original material and the lifestyle is a result of who we follow and He has been faithful since the beginning. Troy commented that because there was fruit behind the teaching it was easy to understand and put into practice. It should be noted that no one can take credit for the fruit that only God can deliver. Serving Troy in this way is one of the joys and indeed responsibilities of following Jesus.
            Once we begin taking credit for the accomplishments of others we have missed the mark in a dangerous manner. To this writer’s understanding it is much like a wrench taking credit for the overhaul of a transmission. Not only does it take many tools to get the job done it takes a mechanic to put the tools to use. This is not to say there is no pleasure for the individual in a discipling relationship but it is to say that the idea of self will be far removed from that pleasure. Serving the gospel, whether in evangelism or discipleship is a striving for a glory that is not our own. 
            Teaching is most effective with trust in place. It is necessary to teach and instruct each other and so again we come back to the example of Jesus.
“My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you” (John 15:12-15, NIV).
Our teaching comes from the Father as it did to the Son and we share in this teaching as we give it to others. We have been commanded to love and in this we are able to participate in an amazing aspect of the divine nature called friendship. Having asked Troy what he recalls about any teaching from our encounters, he used a term we are both trying to get away from but cannot: organic.
            Encouragement overtook my heart at hearing it and perhaps this is a sample of the pleasure an individual may experience in a discipling relationship. The idea of a robotic faith or a rinse and repeat approach did not sit well with Troy. Prepackaged evangelism is just a small step away from prepackaged discipleship and eventually Christianity.
“In some cases the method of witnessing we’re asked to use causes our evangelophobia. If it requires approaching someone we’ve never met before and striking up a conversation about Christ, most people will be terrified and indicate it by their absence” (Whitney 1992, 96).[1]
This is not to say there were not solid teachings and foundational truths offered to Troy in a prepackaged approach but we all must grow out of our mold. On to maturity as it is commonly phrased. This was my approach to teaching my friend Troy. Show him the tools given to us as His children and then let him play with them.
          Troy grew in ways that still encourage my soul today. This is the power of discipling relationships in that we can remove stumbling blocks for each other and then share in the joy of moving past them. Witnessing Troy develop as a man of God was empowering and completely fulfilling. It was at this time my mind was finally awakened to the fact that Troy is now my friend through trust, my fellow brother in following our Lord and my partner in the gospel by grace. Troy earned the trust of his ministry as he released control and became a friend to them as well. Troy still taught from the Bible but control was given to God and his ministry responded by becoming partners in the gospel.
            One vital shift that became evident to those around Troy was the growth of his entrusted ministry. Naturally the initial excitement was found in the number of souls that God was adding to His church. Something else was at work in the hearts of those believers that were in the campus ministry as well. Confidence, security and joy were evident in these men and women. Everyone had a place and felt a part of the family and this was the new radical message of love being passed along. Of course there is nothing new about the message of love but anyone who has ever experienced the blessing of its teaching will tell you it feels new every time.
            Finally Troy was asked to share what he learned from our encounters together. Troy, now a father with children running around him, said in short that there was a different way to do things. We can love this world without a script and we can trust that God is faithful. People can change because they want to and not because they are told to. Love is the long term solution. This is more than could be hoped for because if there was any one point I would want to give, it would be that love never fails.
It was in response to my next question that led me to marvel at the power of God and the joy or serving Him in this capacity. What is your approach to discipling relationships? What are you attempting to impress upon others in Christ? Troy said, “Neighbor is a global term not a local term, how we live matters.” This is one of many convictions that have developed in the maturing process of this man of God. A genuine discipling relationship affords both the privilege of sharing in our victories as well as defeats. In summary trust must be built and not manufactured, training must be rooted in the teaching of Jesus, friendship must become partnership and the legacy of love must be impressed to the next generation. When training one another in Christ we must allow each other the freedom to come to Jesus on our own two feet.




[1] Whitney, Donald S. Spiritual Disciplines For The Christian Life. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1992.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Dad Reports on His Kid


            This report was the more challenging and yet more rewarding that my previous two. Unlike Chris, a man in his twenties or Sarah, a woman in her forties, this report was centered on Benoni Moghadam. Benoni is my soon to be ten year old boy and he has heard the gospel message many times and is quite proficient in Bible memorization. On paper this may appear to be a much easier task but in reality the factors of age and relationship made this report a challenge. Choosing an approach that is best suited for the needs of the individual is not legalism, it is a practice of wisdom.
            Some may suggest or even strongly believe that if a child is both proficient in bible verses and understands that Jesus is the Messiah why not just allow them make their good confession and be baptized? Whether or not Benoni has already accepted Jesus as his Lord is between him and the Father not his father. This disturbs many but my hermeneutic of scripture leaves my conscience clear albeit perhaps not innocent. This being said it has always been my goal to train Benoni so that he lives his Christian life in love and not a parent’s expectation.
            The Apostle Peter put into words what has become a key theme in our home concerning the children and their pursuit of Christ.
“In it only a few people, eight in all, were saved through water, and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him” (1 Peter 3:20b-22, NIV).

The pledge of a good conscience before God is highly regarded in the home. After personal reflection this week it was my decision to take a different approach with Benoni while teaching him the gospel message. The pursuit of holiness out of love for Christ became a reoccurring theme in my reading and because of this Benoni was led in this way as well.
            We began by discussing the disciplines required to pursue holiness effectively. More importantly, we discussed the reasons why we would pursue holiness and why the need for discipline in order to accomplish the goal. “The gold of Godliness isn’t found on the surface of Christianity. It has to be dug from the depths with the tools of the Disciplines” (Whitney 1992, 19)[1]. This idea grabbed Benoni’s attention as we often speak of finding our gold nugget in our Bible readings. Gold must be mined and sought after but the rewards go well beyond riches.

            Following our conversation of discipline Benoni was immediately ready to read every day, pray every day, share every day and sing every day with incredible enthusiasm. This is not a bad thing by any stretch however; we must caution all whom we share the message with that doing the right things will not free us from sin. “At the same time, however, the pursuit of holiness must be anchored in the grace of God; otherwise it is doomed to failure” (Bridges 1994, 12)[2]. With this opportunity in front of us we further discussed one of our favorite topics as we spoke about the miracle of grace.
            For even in grace we find discipline as these two seemingly opposite functions find perfect balance in Christ. “For Christ’s love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again” (2 Corinthians 5:15, NIV). It is our love for Christ and gratitude for the grace we have received by His love and mercy that compels us to live for Him and deny ourselves. This is the foundation for understanding what it means to love God with all your heart, mind and strength.
            Staying on track with this new methodology we began to look at the existential outcome of loving God because He first loved us. Disciples are adherents to the Word of God and not just learners of it. This is a vital truth that cannot be removed from the message and we should be able to show this truth by the relationships we have with one another. This is how God’s people show themselves to be a light in this world. “They learn God's truth together (head level). They embrace God's truth together (heart level), and they live God's truth together (hand level)” (Lecture 5 2014)[3]. Benoni mentioned a friend of mine that came to visit recently as an example and a wave of encouragement washed over me.
            Preaching the gospel through the lens of pursuing holiness is challenging as we cannot leave the individual with just the good news. The bad news is we need discipline in order to pursue holiness because our very nature will take away from the cross before we humbly bow to it. There is no sugar coating the truth about sin and this is true even for an almost ten year old.  Sin separates and removes us from that same grace we celebrated earlier. “That’s how the Bible talks about the depth and darkness of our sin—it is in us and of us, not just on us” (Gilbert 2010, 54)[4].
We pursue holiness in desperation as we are compelled by the love given to those who deserved only death. It is inside us all and all have sinned. We then examined Benoni’s favorite Old Testament figure, King David in a new light. Benoni read the report given to David by the prophet Nathaniel and it was confusing. Even King David was a sinner as we all are and his sin was no different than our own in that it is unacceptable in the presence of God. “So when we sin we are in effect treating God and His Word with disdain or contempt; we are despising Him” (Bridges 1994, 36)[5]. This was sobering to say the least.
This is a great example of just how much we need each other as followers of Jesus. If David could be moved to act in such a way how could any of us imagine we would not be led astray? Benoni remarked, “But that’s why we have Jesus?” This is why we need Jesus. My final encouragement to Benoni was that while we are so special in the eyes of our God we must not become consumed with ourselves. “Contemporary Christians are to be faithful disciples who invest in others who also invest in others and so on. They are not the last link in the discipleship chain − just the next one” (Lecture 5 2014)[6]. Choosing an approach that is best suited for the needs of the individual is not legalism, it is a practice of wisdom.



[1] Whitney, Donald S. Spiritual Disciplines For The Christian Life. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1992.
[2] Bridges, Jerry. The Disciple of Grace God's Role and Our Role in the Pursuit of Holiness. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1994.
[3] Lecture 5. "MIN-525: Evangelism and Discipleship." Grand Canyon University. Phoenix, AZ, 2014.
[4] Gilbert, Greg. What Is the Gospel? Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.
[5] Bridges, Jerry. The Disciple of Grace God's Role and Our Role in the Pursuit of Holiness. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1994.
[6] Lecture 5. "MIN-525: Evangelism and Discipleship." Grand Canyon University. Phoenix, AZ, 2014.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Old News???


            Many would agree that the senior members of a fellowship act as the backbone as they provide priceless experience and maturity. Yet when it comes to evangelistic efforts made by our churches today this senior adult group is by far the most under served and ill regarded. The reason for this lack of evangelistic effort varies from church to church. Many of today’s churches have put all their effort into youth and college ministries as to build a foundation for the future. This is a wise strategy in many ways but those that are at the closest point of facing judgment are receiving little to no attention from God’s messengers.
            Much of the issue revolves around the ideology of picking the low hanging fruit first.  This is to say there are far more willing hearers of the Gospel message among other age groups than that of the senior adult. The other main issue with serving our seniors is in the complexity and general lack of understanding in how to reach them with the Gospel of Jesus. While the first issue is a matter of what can easily be labeled “disputable matters” the latter is simply unacceptable as it implies that God’s people are allowed to stop loving the lost at a particular age.
            We can look to no better starting point then the Bible itself. We find in both the Old Testament as well as the New that God has a plan for senior adults and they will indeed “dream dreams”.  This prophetic statement began with Joel but found its way to Peter’s proclamation at Pentecost. The New covenant between God and man never removed the viability and necessity of the older population. We later see the Apostle Paul giving a young servant of Christ sound advice concerning those that are older. “Do not rebuke an older man harshly, but exhort him as if he were your father. Treat younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity” (1 Timothy 5:1-2, NIV).

            Clearly there was to be much more expectation than pandering or an occasional serving of our elder members. There was to be respect and this respect was to be given at the highest order as one would show respect to their father or mother. A recognition and honoring of life and experience is appropriate for the lost senior population, and they are in a position that is reserved especially for their journey in life. “Lost senior adults are at a stage in life where they are reflecting on the past and are more open to considering what will happen to them after death” (McRaney 2003, 168).[1] We desperately try to press the importance to those we share the Gospel with that these may be end times. Lost seniors may not be considering the ultimate impact of our eternal soul but the weight of mortality is certainly more prevalent to them.
            With other age groups sharing the Gospel becomes more attractive simply because the society around them is being molded and shaped by them. Movie nights, volleyball games, barbeques and bonfires are not really considering the senior adult and thoughtfully so. No one wants to witness an elderly person get hurt trying to dive for that volleyball. With this in mind we can begin to formulate a different outreach strategy. “If we as the church are to reach our society, this means that we should have a thought-out strategy for ministering to seniors” (Jasko 2012).[2] Where do we begin?
            Just as we consider the youth and plan volleyball games and other activities we must now consider what the senior adult would be attracted to. This will be challenging as our natural thought will look to an activity rather than a point of sharing the Gospel. Truly, sharing with the senior adult can appear upside down and for good reason as they are on the back half of life’s journey. Since a senior has had time to reflect on their own life and recall past joys and pains their reality calls out for depth, therefore, we must also be deep. Confirm the reality of faith and just how amazing it is as it has been working in their life from the beginning until now.
            This is relevant and it is empowering because life is not over and faith is not finished with them, it is much more than they ever cared to consider it. “Faith is not believing in something you can’t prove, as so many people define it. It is, biblically speaking, reliance” (Gilbert 2010, 74).[3] Start from the beginning and go through to the end as the history of the world has a way of being captured by the mind of an individual that has considered their own history within the world. “When it was all over, the guilt of Adam had inflicted on his entire race would be defeated, the death God pronounced over his own creation would die, and hell would be brought to its knees” (Gilbert 2010, 60-61).[4]
            The fight is not over and the war can still be won. Asking our seniors open ended questions is almost irrelevant as simple yes and no answers have incredible impact for those that understand their time on earth is limited. We do not change the message or lessen its impact in any way, shape or form but we deliver it with care to the person we are reaching. “While being sensitive to different age and gender groups, they can remain true to the Gospel. They are both responsible and relevant in their witness” (Lecture 3 2014).[5] For example, when it is raining outside the mail carrier wears a raincoat but the mail does not change; only the delivery method is in order to protect the mail.
            The same desperation and zeal should be in place when evangelizing the lost senior as it is with any other age group. This being said it will require your desperation and zeal to be mature enough to meet a person where they are at and not where your own desire and will wants them to be. The senior population is on the lookout for scam artists and the like as they have seen almost everything under the sun. We will not scare them into repentance and cheap tricks like distracting trips to Seven Flags will not entice them. Real faith rooted in Christ and on display for them to see and experience is the call and perhaps the reason the senior adult is not being reached.
            In summary, the lost senior is very much on the heart and mind of our God.  He has a plan for them and a purpose for their life, both now towards the end of it and of course after it.  There is an understanding of mortality that is hard to consider at other stages of life and in this there is a starting point for the Gospel.  “Sometimes, sadly, one of those attending the Senior Citizens’ work dies. How important to ensure that such a person heard the gospel preached, saw the message lived out amongst the Christians, and had the opportunity of salvation” (Bennett 2013)![6] While reaching those in various age and gender groups are of the utmost importance we cannot neglect those that are at the closest point of facing judgment.




Bibliography


Bennett, John. Working With Seniors Citizens - Part 2. 2013. http://www.preciousseed.org/article_detail.cfm?articleID=3182 (accessed November 16, 2015).
Gilbert, Greg. What Is the Gospel? Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.
Jasko, Ken. Senior Adult Ministry. 2012. http://www.njag.org/senior-adult-ministry (accessed November 14, 2015).
Lecture 3. "MIN-525: Evangelism and Discipleship." Grand Canyon University. Phoenix, AZ, 2014.
McRaney, Will. The Art of Personal Evangelism. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2003.





[1] McRaney, Will. The Art of Personal Evangelism. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2003.
[2] Jasko, Ken. Senior Adult Ministry. 2012. http://www.njag.org/senior-adult-ministry (accessed November 14, 2015).
[3] Gilbert, Greg. What Is the Gospel? Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.
[4] Gilbert, Greg. What Is the Gospel? Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2010.
[5] Lecture 3. "MIN-525: Evangelism and Discipleship." Grand Canyon University. Phoenix, AZ, 2014.
[6] Bennett, John. Working With Seniors Citizens - Part 2. 2013. http://www.preciousseed.org/article_detail.cfm?articleID=3182 (accessed November 16, 2015).

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Being before Knowing

Ontology before Epistemology
                The term worldview in it of itself does not appear to be multifaceted or even difficult and yet the way one views the world around them can be as varied as the individual.  We will examine these layers in two primary and very general genres of worldview thinking, the Christian worldview and the secular worldview.  These categories of thinking are not as black and white as one might think, nor are they divided by religion versus no religion. The differences are also found on a philosophical basis affected by morality and made evident in everyday living.  In these differences we will also examine the commonality all worldviews share in that something is present rather than nothing at all. Something versus nothing simply makes reference to the idea that the universe and the world we live in was caused by something. We will then make the Christian argument for ontology, or being, before epistemology, or knowing. 

Initially one must define what a worldview is before it can be dissected into different interpretations.  This is not uncommon as different words carry different meanings when directly translated into a familiar language, and these variances are due to many factors such as culture and education.  As in any relationship when there is communication and understanding there is progress towards trust as well as a sharing of ideas.  “In historical perspective, the understanding (or lack thereof) of the worldviews of other groupings and cultures has enabled improved communication, prediction, and often influence or control of those other cultural entities” (Grand Canyon University, 2010).  In basic and useful terms for our purposes, a worldview is the way someone thinks about the world around them.
Much in the same way the definition of religion can have one meaning but be categorized in several areas such as the Christian religion, Jewish religion or Muslim religion a worldview also has its categories attached to its definition.  Since we are contrasting secular versus Christian worldviews we need a working definition for secularism.  “Secular humanism is a ‘street’ version of atheistic naturalism; that is, it is an atheism that ordinary people are living in the streets. This belief is rarely a firm, thinking atheism but is more of an ’I-don’t-know-and-I-don’t-care’ agnosticism. Either way, atheism or agnosticism, God is left out and ignored” (Cosgrove, 2006, p. 99).  Within the secular view the human or individual takes center stage as the reasoning behind how his or her world is viewed or shaped.  Even with something being there rather than nothing, the something is not on center stage in this worldview.
There is little reason to name a type of causality or the “something” under this worldview as the individual is now the sole interpreter.  For instance one secularist, Wilhelm Dilthey, while complying with the secular worldview, completely leaves God out of his understanding. “A worldview, then, is the shaping structure of our own autonomous selves. We see what we see. We understand what we understand” (Sire, 2004, p. 26). A picture is being painted here that indicates that while DIlthey’s view is not religious a secular view does not mean it is automatically irreligious either.  Instead this worldview is reliant on humanity and its ability to reason, think and perceive the world around itself.
One of the most famous thinkers of his time, Friedrich Nietzsche, offers yet another look at secularism through the lens or perspective of atheism.  Nietzsche is the famed author of the phrase, “God is dead” and while this appears to be a hate-filled attack on the Christian or theistic worldviews there is more to this statement.  God the being was not dead in Nietzsche’s statement but rather the counterproductive view that God was ever there was now being disposed of in order to allow humanity to move forward as it could rather than should.  “People might say they believed in God, but their thoughts and actions betrayed their functional atheism” (Sire, 2004, p. 27). Functional atheism is perhaps the best way to frame his worldview.
Secular worldviews have their roots in humanism and knowledge or reasoning and this differs from the foundational ideas of the Christian worldview. Under these guidelines a case can be made for epistemology preceding ontology as the mind understands what it understands and as a result leads to a human literally being.  The Christian worldview breaks off from secularism at the root as our Creator gives us the understanding of something being before anything let alone conscious thought.  The Christian worldview holds firmly to the understanding that indeed there is more than just nothingness in the world but that the something there is a Creator and this is our prime reality.  This is our reason and explanation for our worldview in its entirety. 
One of the primary differences is in an absence of self-reliance for answers but rather a dependence on the hope of our God.  “Human purpose will not be self-determined by any person, community, nation or multinational group but will be predetermined by God” (Sire, 2004, p. 55).
So unlike many secularists that proclaim a worldview is simply the by-product on an environment the Christian worldview declares something greater than surrounding knowledge is at work. The Christian worldview states that since there was something before anything then being must come before knowledge as a natural order of reality.
Make no mistake there are in fact many intricacies within the Christian worldview and this can somewhat be attributed but not limited to varying denominational doctrines as well as an individual’s experience within the Christian worldview.  The foundation remains secure and under the unified conviction that God is really what is real or the prime reality.  Whether it be the views of James Orr, Herman Dooyeweerd, Ronald Nash or any of the Christian thinkers we find a unified effort to draw away from human reasoning and intellect as a foundation but rather a byproduct of the created world around us.  “Moreover, people – each individual and all of them together – are who God has made them to be, not who they think they are or declare themselves to be” (Sire, 2004, p. 55).  Here God creates the world we live in and man lives according to a creator’s will, rather than man conjuring a world around him and becoming a god unto himself.
This leads us to the primary Christian worldview understanding of ontology coming before epistemology.  God will declare this many times for us throughout biblical history but the most revealing display of ontology before epistemology comes from the “I AM” conversation with Moses.  “God said to Moses, ‘I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you’” (Exodus 3:14, NIV).  In this statement there is the claim of omnipresence and absolute sovereignty.  I AM is both the Alpha as well as the Omega and everything in between standing outside of time. The Christian worldview understands God in this light and therefore we make our claim that something has been here first and therefore everything else must follow after that event which includes being.
Removing man’s perceived abilities and attributes by accepting that humanity has been created with a design in place, which includes reasoning and conceptualizing, makes room for the claim of ontology before epistemology.  “Epistemology is predicated on the nature of what is, not on an autonomous ability, human reason disengaged from God. Moreover, there is no dichotomy between religious knowledge and secular knowledge” (Sire, 2004, p. 55).  The Christian worldview acknowledges secular knowledge in the same light as religious knowledge because we have come to know our prime reality.  So knowledge regardless of its perspective arrives from the same origin.

If humanity is created then so are all the components that comprise the human world.  With this worldview there is a basis for acknowledging that a created thing cannot take credit for a creator’s work.  The Christian worldview’s case for ontology before epistemology can be found in the work of Christ.  For he was with God (the I AM) in the beginning and because of this all things find their being in him.  “You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being” (Revelations 4:11, NIV). From the first to the last writings about the Christ we find Jesus at the center of why being comes before knowing.  In the end the difference between these worldviews is found in which man receives credit for the “something” rather than the “nothing”.

References:

Cosgrove, M. P. (2006). Foundations of Christian Thought: Faith, Learning, and the Christian Worldview. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications.
Grand Canyon University. (2010). Historical, Philosophical, and Epistemological Considerations in Developing a Worldview. Phoenix, AZ.
Sire, J. W. (2004). Naming the Elephant. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.